
Here I was, thinking about writing an open letter to Warren Kinsella, trying to warn him off (fruitlessly, I’d imagine) a negative campaign against John Tory and Randy Hillier, when McGuinty genuinely surprises me. I may still send out that open letter, but after this past Friday I may have to change a few details.
My fear with the coming Ontario election was that the Ontario Liberals would refuse to run on their record, and focus instead on tying John Tory to the legacy of Mike Harris, and to the statements of the more controversial candidates on the Tory team. This did not strike me as productive; it struck me as an acknowledgement that the Liberals offer only basic competence to run on, and that they have that nasty little Health Tax Premium controversy to try and get the voters to forget about. But then, around noon last Friday, McGuinty abandoned mere competence, quiet incremental approaches and safe campaigns for one of the boldest policies on public transportation that I’ve seen in a generation.
MoveOntario 2020 is an obvious election goody, and at $17.5 billion, it’s sure to make fiscal conservatives blanche, but cities have been calling for such funding for years. Congestion is choking the economy of the Greater Toronto Area and risks costing us far more than this investment. These 52 projects (coupled with a map) represent a collection of almost everybody’s wishlist, and will result in significant improvements to the mobility of the Greater Toronto Area between now and 2020. Rather than drawing lines on a map and hampering its own projects by having to start the planning process afresh, the McGuinty government has focused on plans that cities have already long studied, or where work is already underway, suggesting that we may see shovels in the ground before the 2011 election, assuming the McGuinty Liberals are reelected.
Oh, and Kitchener-Waterloo gets its LRT (or BRT).
This could be pie in the sky, of course, and McGuinty still has the credibility issue of his Health Care Premium to overcome, but there are a surprising number of details in this proposal, which makes me believe that the Liberals don’t intend MoveOntario 2020 to quiet fade away come November (and quite possibly they sense they can’t afford to, since at $17.5 billion, such a false promise would dwindle the Health Care Premium tax grab to insignificance).
First of all, the McGuinty government is committing to pay two-thirds of the cost of these projects, absolving cash-strapped cities of their share. It has been suggested that this announcement is retroactive, covering projects that have already been successfully financed, such as the Spadina subway extension to York University. If this is the case, the Liberals have just handed Toronto and York Region close to $350 million in money they’d already committed to spending on this project — money that can either be handed back to taxpayers, or put to needed infrastructure projects that the province hasn’t committed to funding.
More importantly, by cutting municipal contributions out of the loop, the McGuinty Liberals have removed one of the two possible points of failure in any of the funding arrangements. Now it’s all down to a proposed contribution of $6 billion from the federal government, and it has been hinted that, even if that money isn’t forthcoming, with 2/3rds of the cash on the table, we can still proceed with a number of these projects, waiting the feds out until the political realities change, or simply accepting a slower pace of progress.
Secondly, the Liberals have costed out the proposal and told voters how they they intend to pay for it. Of the $12 billion the Liberals commit, the Liberals promise to finance this over fifty years, suggesting to me that they intend to issue bonds — a wise investment to make if you believe as many do that investments such as this will pay off in real economic growth over the next fifty years. This means that the money is available, and isn’t reliant on a significant improvement of Ontario’s fiscal fortunes. This may also be another reason why the cities were cut out of the funding loop; provincial taxpayers are more likely to save money and actually get things done if the province acts as the sole borrower, rather than having over a dozen municipalities scramble to raise their own funds.
Finally, there is the fact that the 52 projects represent a comprehensive network throughout the GTA, rather than a subway here to placate Vaughan and an LRT there to buy somebody else’s vote. Steve Munro has a detailed rundown of what these projects represent and how they relate to each other, not to mention why we can believe that this represents more than just pie in the sky. Until this year, he’d been pretty cynical about the prospect of decent investments in public transportation, but his attitude has changed. He has been involved in transit advocacy for over thirty-five years, so if he sees reason to hope at long last, then so do I.
I didn’t vote for McGuinty in 2003 (I instead voted Green), and I was seriously considering voting Conservative this time around (an easy thing to do when your Conservative candidate is Elizabeth Witmer). McGuinty’s MoveOntario proposal has stopped me short, however. Yes, there is a credibility issue to overcome, and yes, my willingness to vote Liberal will be tempered by the negative campaigning that’s sure to come, but I want these proposals to bear fruit.
So now I turn my attention to John Tory, whom I like. Campaigning for mayor of Toronto, he showed an understanding of the city’s issues that I feel has carried through to his leadership of the Progressive Conservative party. His transportation policy promised significant investments and talked a good game, but was short on details and even shorter on providing cost estimates. Hearteningly, some of the initial reaction from the Conservatives to the MoveOntario proposal was that the Liberals had stolen their ideas. Really? Well, that’s good then, as it suggests that the plan isn’t killed by a potential Conservative victory in October (we hope). If the Conservatives are willing to match the Liberal proposal in terms of funding commitments, and timeline, then I will be very optimistic about the future of southern Ontario, and I won’t be compelled to vote against Tory (indeed, I still even be willing to vote for Witmer).
There’s still plenty of time before the election, and I’ll be watching the Conservative platform with interest.
June 23, 2007 11:18 AM
I’d be happier seeing Toronto pony up some cash if the alternative is hoping the feds will do so soon - I hate tripartite funding because one party is always slow pulling their wallet out of their pants.
June 23, 2007 12:30 PM
It’s a good plan, but it’s not enough to get me to even consider voting for the Liberals. They’ve broken so many promises, grandstanded while important issues festered unaddressed and generally indulged in shameless self-congratulation that I can’t even look at provincial Liberals without feeling my stomach clench.
June 23, 2007 1:26 PM
James, I’m surprised you’re falling for this ruse. These are nothing back vacuous and delicate promises by an anxious government desperate to hold onto votes. Ontarians are being swindled by this pompous and supercilious government. I’ll be curious for your comments late in the campaign when the Liberals ramp up their negative campaigning and begin shamelessly smearing opposing candidates as they have in recent by-elections.
There is no record on which this government can run, which is possibly the most disgraceful aspect of the McGuinty Liberals. The best predictor of future behaviour is past behaviour, and the Ontario Liberals have done nothing- particularly appalling given that they had a full term of unfettered governance, a healthy economy, and strong support.
Instead, McGuinty undermined any credibility he had by constantly going back on his word. His government conducted by a bunch of smug and arrogant thugs (Smitheman leads this list) whose sole concern was retaining votes, which they did through deception (empty promises), intimidation (look back at their attacks on Cheri DiNovo), and corruption (slush gate, LottoGate, HydroOne, CAS). Calling these guys the Libranos, while not tasteful is also not entirely inaccurate.
I may be overstating things a little but if Ontarians are going to buy this drivel from McGuinty, then the counterspin will have to be overstated. Precious that at the end of its mandate, this government suddenly becomes “really” interested green energy, in infrastructure. Next it will be education and health care promises. And finally, McGuinty will unveil a “poverty agenda”, and we saw in the budget how vacuous those words are coming from a Liberal- the shoes on Sorbara’s feet cost more than what the working poor will benefit the entire year from this budget.
June 23, 2007 1:41 PM
That’s a fair comment, and I’ve already said that McGuinty has a credibility gap to overcome. However, I’ve also pointed out why this proposal has a lot more meat to it, and seems a lot less likely to disappear than his flimsier but clearer promise to “I won’t lower your taxes, but I won’t raise them either”. Steve Munro, a transit activist for thirty-five years, is as cynical as they come, but if he sees reason to hope, then so do I.
The fact is, I’ve been asking for precisely this sort of investment for more about ten years. I’ve been banging my head against this wall from Petersen to Rae to Harris to Eves, to the first four years of McGuinty. Such a plan has to happen; it simply has to, or we’re close to toast.
So, I’m looking now to the New Democrats for their commitment to hold the McGuinty Liberals to their plan, and I am looking to the Progressive Conservatives to bring forward a similar level of detail, funding commitment and timeline to their public transportation plan. If we get similar commitments from the other two parties, I’ll be optimistic for the future of southern Ontario, and I won’t feel compelled to limit my support to McGuinty.
But if the other two parties don’t respond with concrete policies of their own, I’m in a quandary. I really want this plan to happen. So, if I’m faced with a choice between a party who promises this, but may not have the credibility to follow through on it, and a party which doesn’t promise this at all, who do I support?
Right now, the Liberals offer me the most hope that the transportation picture in Ontario will significantly improve by 2020, and that’s what the other parties need to catch up to, and fast.
June 23, 2007 5:04 PM
Closing Nanticoke was a good idea. Accountable and transparent governance was a good idea. Eradicating child poverty was a good idea. Building 20,000 units of affordable housing was a good idea. Ending the clawback of child benefits was a good idea. And MoveOntario is a good idea. My point was rather that when McGuinty says something it either means he’ll do nothing or he’ll do the opposite. Nanticoke not only is not closed but with the Conservative plan of adding scrubbers, Ontario’s air would actually better cleaner under a Conservative government. Instead of responsible government we saw entitlement and American style negative campaigning. Through freedom of information we find that the Ontario Liberals have built less than 500 units of affordable housing (renting between $300-500). The clawback has not ended nor will it for 4 years from now…
June 26, 2007 4:29 PM
“So, I’m looking now to the New Democrats for their commitment to hold the McGuinty Liberals to their plan”
Either Howard Hampton or Cheri DiNovo said they would do exactly that when I was at Cheri’s nomination meeting last week.