Thu, Aug
21
2008

Charles McVety Embarrasses Christians Everywhere

Charles McVety and his Millions

Image courtesy Bouquets of Gray.

Speaking as a Christian, I just want to say that I am embarrassed that social conservatives like Charles McVety claim to represent who I am and what I believe. Nothing could be further from the truth. For one thing, I have integrity, and I don’t try to deceive people.

Over a month ago, there was a mild controversy when Dr. Morgantaler, an individual who was at the heart of the abortion debate almost twenty years ago, was granted an Order of Canada, one of the highest honours this nation can bestow. I say there was a mild controversy because, even though the appointment did generate some headlines, and a few individuals returned (or claimed to have returned) their awards in protest, most Canadians, pro-life and pro-choice alike, just shrugged their shoulders and moved on.

But people like McVety have problems moving on, it seems. After a month of fruitlessly trying to maintain attention over the Morgantaler award, a group of 42 “conservative Christian” organizations filed a formal complaint against Supreme Court Justice Beverley McLachlin, asking for her to be removed from her post. Justice McLachlin is said to be one of the individuals who succeeded in granting Dr. Morgantaler his honour.

Not one conservative Christian group! Not two! Forty-two! Count ‘em! Forty-two!. Much was made of this number, to suggest a broad, grassroots support for this action against the Supreme Court Justice. Forty-two groups stood up to say, “no!”

Or… make that 39:

if you look you’ll find “David Murrell, Phd, UNB, Economics” — who is clearly not a group, but an individual.

And some of those listed aren’t groups, but private businesses. Consider these three:

That’s not all. If you click on the links you’ll see that these three businesses share the same address: 156 Berryman Ave, St. Catharines. Presumably this is one pro-life business owner.

(link)

Or is that 38?

The same point can probably be made about this pair, which are 22nd and 23rd in the list.

Or is that 36:

Among Rushfeld’s … socially conservative groups demanding that Supreme Court Justice Beverley McLachlin be dismissed are these three (they are 8th, 24th, and 25th in the list):

Canada Christian College is an evangelical bible college and seminary (wikipedia article [here]). The college and its president, Charles McVety, have been at the vanguard of the social conservative movement in recent years. The College is located in Toronto at 50 Gervais Drive, and its phone number is 416-391-5000.

The Evangelical Association, as you can see if you follow the link, is a credentialing organization directed by Rondo Thomas, who is VP of Student Affairs at Canada Christian College. For $50 per year and a processing fee, you can be ordained or licensed as a pastor, provided you are of good moral character and either have a theological education or are open to classes at the Canada Christian College. The Association’s address is 50 Gervais Drive, Don Mills, Toronto, and its phone number is 416-391-5000.

If you follow the link for The Institute for Canadian Values, you’ll see that it has the same address (50 Gervais) and same phone number (391-5000) as the CCC and Evangelical Association. In addition, the president of the ICV is Charles McVety, president of CCC.

To make a long story short, the blogger Bouquets of Gray has so far whittled the list of 42 groups down to 25, by identifying wanton duplication, largely of Charles McVety’s own sock-puppet organizations.

You know, I get that McVety and his friends are offended by Morgantaler’s Order of Canada honour. And I suppose they are as free as anybody else to stand up and demand that a Supreme Court Justice be removed because of it. But if they had stood up with their group of 25 and spoken, they would have had somewhat more credibility than what they’ve done, which is pretend to be larger than who they are, speaking for more people than they actually do.

This isn’t the first time that McVety has engaged in practises that one might term deceptive. During the Same Sex Marriage debate, a tactic he used was to purchase open domain names containing the names of MPs who were in support of the idea, and pointing those domains to his own website. I’m sensing a pattern, here. I would have thought that to be Christian would be not to act deceitfully, but McVety doesn’t seem to believe that such Christian invocations apply to him.

Speaking as a Christian, I just wish that McVety would either engage in the political debate honestly, or shut up. He makes a mockery of the Christian values he claims to uphold and embarrasses true Christians everywhere.

And, yes, I am ultimately speaking for myself. However, I do suspect that I’m far from alone in thinking this.


I Kick Butt, Apparently

I’ve been tagged by Chet Scoville who believes that my blog kicks… uh… butt, apparently. Here’s the rules of the meme:

  • Choose 5 bloggers that you feel are “Kick Ass Bloggers”
  • Let ‘em know in your post or via email, twitter or blog comments that they’ve received an award
  • Share the love and link back to both the person who awarded you and back to www.mammadawg.com
  • Hop on back to the Kick Ass Blogger Club HQ to sign Mr. Linky then pass it on!

Many thanks, Chet. I do my best, though I do find I’m not waxing political as I once was. Now, for my picks of who I think kicks butt…

  • Dave at Blogography. He’s a strange combination: he’s a nice guy, and interesting. Mostly because he takes no prisoners when he confronts the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune. He kicks the butts we’d all like to see kicked.
  • Kate at The Last Amazon. I disagree strongly with some of her politics, especially with regard to Israel, but there is no doubting the passion behind her philosophy. She also engages you honestly, so that you’re free to agree to disagree. Expect to disagree.
  • Calgary Grit. Quite possibly the most even-handed partisan in the blogosphere. When he kicks butt, he doesn’t care if some of the butts he kicks are Liberal. But he does it all with a smile.
  • Angry French Guy. Here’s somebody else I don’t agree with, but it’s got to be rare to see a Quebec separatist engage his audience in English. If you want to see what one member of the other side things (and it’s remarkably coherent), go here.
  • Finally, no list of butt kickers could be complete without a nod to the Canadian Cynic. I don’t always approve of the language, and I’m sometimes intimidated by the passion, but if you want a good butt kicking, here’s where you’ll find it.
  • And as Canadian Cynic has already been linked to, I’ll add Conservative Raphael Alexander’s blog, Unambiguously Ambidextrous. I don’t always agree with him, but he also doesn’t care if the butt he kicks is his own… I mean, his own party’s.

Now, off you go Internet Meme. Fly, Meme! Fly!

8 Comments

Eric

Charles McVety and his ilk are not true Christians. While they speak well of Jesus and urge people to heed his teachings, they do not followed his example. They do not live the sermon on the mount, they do not turn the other cheek and they certainly do not love their neighbours as themselves. Take up your cross daily and follow him? Well, no, that’s not the part of Jesus’ teaching they like. Love your enemies and do good to those who hate us? It feels better to denigrate them and try and get them removed with doctored petitions. Judge not that ye be not judged? But it’s such fun to criticize others. More over they ignore: Acts 4:32-5:11. “The whole group of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one claimed private ownership of any possessions, but everything they owned was held in common.”

This verse, and others in the Book of Acts, discloses that the early Christians were socialists. They were not Marxists, holding with atheism, class warfare, and suppression of dissent, but economic socialists—private property was unknown among them. I don’t see McVety or the Christian Right voting for the socialists in America, They take a dimmer view of human nature, and believe that most people should be out to get what they can for themselves and their families and that God is a capitalist. Capitalist economies are driven by the basic selfishness of human nature. not by the teachings of Christ. Socialism apparently worked well among the early Christians, That’s because they were “of one heart and soul” and respected each other. McVety doesn’t seem to respect his felow Canadians when he submits a doctored petition.

John norris

The silence in our pulpits while we are being overrun by ungodly and unholy politicians began when they sold their birthright for a bowl of pottage in 1954. For the full story check out my book at: www.johnnorrisbook.com

The Blue-Eyed Sheikh

Well, James … very interesting.

Given the fact that you’re willing to praise Canadian Cynic (albeit in a qualified manner), I now know exactly how much attention to pay you when you ask those on the right to condemn a particular piece of rhetoric.

Absolutely none at all.

James Bow

I believe I’ve already explained how Canadian Cynic, though I don’t agree with his tactics, doesn’t match the worst we’ve seen on either side of the fence. Anyway, have you checked out the other sites on the list?

P.S. Welcome back!

The Blue-Eyed Sheikh

Actually, James, the occasion that brought me back to have a look was your leaving an approving comment on Unambiguously Ambidextrous regarding Raphael’s denunciation of Kathy Shaidle.

I do read Unambigously Ambidextrous and the Last Amazon; I’ve read Calgary Grit in the past, although I’m still at a bit of a loss to see how anyone from Calgary can not only be a Liberal, but defend the NEP, as he did in a blog post that pretty much ended my reading his blog.

The fact that you are willing to mention CC in the same class as these bloggers indicates, to me at least, that your concern for civility seems to depend strongly on whose ox is gored.

Which is disappointing. I had thought that you were less partisan than that.

James Bow

Well, I repeat what I said: I disagree with a lot of what CC says and does, but in terms of tone and audience, he does not compare to the extremes that I worry about. Even you would have to agree that he has nothing on Ann Coulter, or, worse, those radical Imans calling for the destruction of western society. Raphael has had some strenuous arguments with Canadian Cynic in the past, and the two aren’t talking, but they have talked in the past, and he most recently expressed a grudging respect for the commentary of CC member, the Pretty Shaved Ape.

If Raphael can maintain these respectful, if not cordial, relations with CC, is it any surprise that I can?

And let’s not forget that I’m also able to respect the commentary of the Last Amazon, so I’m not too worried about my non-partisan credentials.

James Bow

For example, CC doesn’t have the depth of hated rhetoric, nor the prominence, of Sean Hannity of Fox News.

Raphael Alexander

A belated thanks for the kick in the ass. Now I’ll have to see if I should punish anyone else by continuing the meme. :)

By the way, how come you don’t always agree with me? I’m so agreeable! :)

Comments are Closed for this Post